20ga 870- Lightweight or Not?

Topics related to Post - 1898 Remington Shotguns
Post Reply
Wulfman
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: N.W. Wyoming

Re: 20ga 870- Lightweight or Not?

Post by Wulfman »

The 870 "Lightweight" 20 ga. didn't appear in the catalogs until 1972.

All of my 870s have good buttstock to receiver fit.


Den
Virginian
Posts: 685
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:03 pm
Location: Williamsburg, Va.

Re: 20ga 870- Lightweight or Not?

Post by Virginian »

Well, if your serial number ends in 'N', you should have a standard weight 20 gauge receiver, i.e. it's the same size receiver as the 12 gauge. If your serial number ends in 'U', you should have a Lightweight 20 gauge Magnum receiver. 'X' and 'K' indicated the 2-3/4" standard and Lightweight 20 gauge receivers, which are actually identical to the Magnum models, except for the rollmarking and the ejectors. If you have a real poor fit up of the stock and receiver, as in the wood is too small, there is the possibility someone put a Lightweight stock on a standard receiver. I've seen it before. Poor fit from the factory was not at all common.
Remington introduced the scaled down Lightweight 20 gauge receivers in either 1970 or 1972. I thought they introduced the 1100 and 870 scaled down Lightweights at the same time, but all the references I can find now say the 870 trailed by 2 years.
What could have happened... did.
Wulfman
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: N.W. Wyoming

Re: 20ga 870- Lightweight or Not?

Post by Wulfman »

Virginian wrote:Well, if your serial number ends in 'N', you should have a standard weight 20 gauge receiver, i.e. it's the same size receiver as the 12 gauge. If your serial number ends in 'U', you should have a Lightweight 20 gauge Magnum receiver. 'X' and 'K' indicated the 2-3/4" standard and Lightweight 20 gauge receivers, which are actually identical to the Magnum models, except for the rollmarking and the ejectors. If you have a real poor fit up of the stock and receiver, as in the wood is too small, there is the possibility someone put a Lightweight stock on a standard receiver. I've seen it before. Poor fit from the factory was not at all common.
Remington introduced the scaled down Lightweight 20 gauge receivers in either 1970 or 1972. I thought they introduced the 1100 and 870 scaled down Lightweights at the same time, but all the references I can find now say the 870 trailed by 2 years.
The 1100 Lightweights were introduced in 1970 and the 870s in 1972 according to the catalogs I have from those years.


Den
Post Reply