I pulled the buttstock to check numbers and upper and lower tangs have a low 700 number. But surprised to see #44 stamped in the wood under the top tang.





The other is a pretty decent Ballard #3 .22RF with an excellent bore, and a real keeper too.
I can, but there are no markings at all on the left side receiver. Only markings are on the top tang, typical Remington 3 line rollstamp there.aardq wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 4:37 pm Hi Marlinman,
Can you please post a photo of the left side of the receiver?
Thank you,
Daniel
This seems to be an impossibility that I'm puzzled by? I've got both 20 ga. and 16 ga. shells in both brass and paper hulls, and the 16 ga. and 20 ga. are not the same size, or even close. A 16 ga. wont fit in a 20 ga., and a 20 ga. rattles around in the chamber of a 16 ga. And the OD of a brass shell is identical to the same gauge paper shell, so that doesn't make sense either?ChuckD wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 5:56 pm Some people might not be aware that early single barrel Remington shot guns would shoot a 16ga. brass shell or a 20ga paper shell.
There were a couple of articles on single barrel shotguns in last years RSA Journals. Yours looks like it would be a good shooter.
Flayderman's is incorrect. Both brass and paper or plastic hulls are the same size. So a 20 gauge hull is the same size regardless of brass, paper, or plastic. And the same for a 16 gauge, regardless.ChuckD wrote: Thu Jul 25, 2024 3:57 pm Marlinman,
I can't argue with facts. However, Flayderman's states, for Model #1 and #2 Rolling Block Shotguns ( 5E-094 & 5E-094.5) shells could interchange, 16ga. brass and 20ga. paper. I assumed the diameter of the 16ga.brass was the same as 20ga paper.
My rollers are both 12ga. so can't check. We'll take your word on this.
Enjoy yours,
Chu ck