I recently inherited a couple of rolling blocks. This one is in 32-20. The barrel is marked "REMINGTON ARMS CO. ILION, N.Y." Any comments on exact model and approximate worth would be appreciated:
Thanks.
rolling block #2
Re: rolling block #2
Dont have any info for ya. But that would be cool to have one in 32-20 have you had a chance to shoot it yet?
Semper Fidelis
Re: rolling block #2
Haven't shot it, it's not mine. It belongs to an estate and I'm trying to establish a positive ID and value.
Re: rolling block #2
bozodog,
I'm no expert on Rolling Blocks, but from what I see in the photos, this is a Model #1-1/2.
The #2 has a curved frame where it meets the butt stock. The Model #1-1/2 has a thinner
frame than the #1, and the # 1 has shoulders on the stock where it meets the frame.
I my opinion it's more desirable than a M #2.
Chuck D.
I'm no expert on Rolling Blocks, but from what I see in the photos, this is a Model #1-1/2.
The #2 has a curved frame where it meets the butt stock. The Model #1-1/2 has a thinner
frame than the #1, and the # 1 has shoulders on the stock where it meets the frame.
I my opinion it's more desirable than a M #2.
Chuck D.
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 10:47 pm
Re: rolling block #2
That indeed is a #1 1/2 Rolling Block Sporting Rifle. As for values, the #2 is very desireable, but in a centerfire caliber like your .32-20, the #1 1/2 is even more desireable! A 1 1/2 in .32-20, with a good bore and the condition of your gun will usually run around $1500. Your tang sight is not original to the gun, as the original would have two base mounting holes spaced 1.90" apart. Most likely someone could not find the right sight, so they trimmed the back part off, which is much better than drilling a new hole to match the sight! Your #1 1/2 is a post 1898, as it uses the late style forearm without the steel tip.-Vall
Below are the various Rem. Sporters from top to bottom, #1, 1 1/2, 2, 3, and 4.
Below are the various Rem. Sporters from top to bottom, #1, 1 1/2, 2, 3, and 4.