Question for David Fagan re 0/U Derringer

Topics related to Pre - 1898 Remington Pistols
Post Reply
44flattop

Question for David Fagan re 0/U Derringer

Post by 44flattop »

I saw a high condition blue Derringer at a gun show today with two unusual markings on rt side frame above trigger/just beheath opening latch. There was a horizonal arrow (like a broadhead) pointing to the right and then a verticle "anchor". Do you happen to know what these mean if anything?
Thanks, Bill
User avatar
DavidFagan
Posts: 368
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 9:08 pm
Location: Glen Ellyn, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Question for David Fagan re 0/U Derringer

Post by DavidFagan »

44flattop wrote:I saw a high condition blue Derringer at a gun show today with two unusual markings on rt side frame above trigger/just beheath opening latch. There was a horizonal arrow (like a broadhead) pointing to the right and then a verticle "anchor". Do you happen to know what these mean if anything?
Thanks, Bill
I wouldn't consider myself an authority of doubles there's probably a lot of people on here that can answer better then I. I assume these are fourth models (UMC's) and the marks you are referring to are inspector marks. I don't know if anyone can tie the marks to a person or not but off the top of my head, I think I have this written down somewhere, besides the arrow and anchor there's atleast sun, dumbell, and a star. Another good clue when your looking at a nickel gun to see if it's original the proof is stamped through the finish not before (under it). It's real obvious when you see it. You can also tell a early fourth by the serations which are crosshatched checkering and x-checkered hammer spur, the later have vertical serration on the ejector and transverse serrations on the hammer spur. Of course if it'a made in 1922 or later you can just look at the date codes on the barrel lug lockup ;)
AND if I'm wrong somebody please speak up!
David J. Fagan
The Silicon Sorcerer
44flattop

Q for David, 0/U Derringer

Post by 44flattop »

David, thanks for a quick reply. Yes, it was a 4th variation. I was not aware that those had a variety of inspectors marks like described. I sure appreciate the education.
Post Reply