Hey everyone, my dad bought this several years ago and was told it was from the Spanish-American War. I don't know if he really cared whether that was true; he just seemed to think it was cool. Anyway, firearms are not part of my knowledge base, and I tried doing my own research on this, but there's just so much out there (and I'm not familiar with the terms at all) so I figured it would be easier to just ask the professionals.
Measurements:
Overall length: 39-1/2"
Barrel length: 23-13/16"
Inner diameter: 0.303"
Outer diameter: 0.620"
I took as many pictures as I could fathom needing, but tried to cut them down so here's a description of some of the smaller markings:
Buttplate: "23" sideways in the middle, no texture on buttplate,
Top of buttplate: "8" just forward of the screw,
Barrel band (single band): "R" on one side, "B" on other side.
Three more pictures in the comments.
The rifle is still at my parent's house, but I can get more measurements or whatever if needed.
Thanks in advance!
Another Rolling Block ID Request
Another Rolling Block ID Request
- Attachments
-
- Stock removed
- 20250105_162614.jpg (1.29 MiB) Viewed 2630 times
-
- Under barrel, 2
- 20250105_161710.jpg (1.48 MiB) Viewed 2630 times
-
- Under barrel, 1
- 20250105_161654.jpg (1.77 MiB) Viewed 2630 times
-
- Range, top down
- 20241220_144608.jpg (2.82 MiB) Viewed 2630 times
-
- Range, left side view
- 20241220_145116.jpg (1.67 MiB) Viewed 2630 times
-
- Between Mechanism and Sight
- 20241220_144615.jpg (3.03 MiB) Viewed 2630 times
-
- Mechanism, side view
- 20241220_144630.jpg (3.28 MiB) Viewed 2630 times
-
- Upper tang, top
- 20241220_144714.jpg (3.16 MiB) Viewed 2630 times
-
- Right side of stock (upside down)
- 20241220_144836.jpg (3.68 MiB) Viewed 2630 times
-
- Side view
- Overview.jpg (2.35 MiB) Viewed 2630 times
Re: Another Rolling Block ID Request
Here's the other pictures, let me know if I need to get more. Thanks again.
- Attachments
-
- 20241220_145148.jpg (4.26 MiB) Viewed 2629 times
-
- 20241220_145134.jpg (3.22 MiB) Viewed 2629 times
-
- Tip of barrel
- Tip of barrel.jpg (1.9 MiB) Viewed 2629 times
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 10:47 pm
Re: Another Rolling Block ID Request
It appears to be a built up gun, and far from original. The 1/4" all thread sticking out of the front of the action is quite puzzling, and I have no idea why it's there? Likely someone threaded the wiping rod lug to 1/4-2oNC, but why?
The barrel appears to be from a 03 Springfield and likely still in .30-06 cartridge? The phillips head screw through the top tang to hold the buttstock on is wrong, as it should be a straight slotted screw. The numbers on the sides of the top tang and lower tang should match, so someone swapped on the different lower tang.
I believe it's a later #5 smokeless action used to build this up.
The barrel appears to be from a 03 Springfield and likely still in .30-06 cartridge? The phillips head screw through the top tang to hold the buttstock on is wrong, as it should be a straight slotted screw. The numbers on the sides of the top tang and lower tang should match, so someone swapped on the different lower tang.
I believe it's a later #5 smokeless action used to build this up.
Re: Another Rolling Block ID Request
Hi There,
Marlinman93 is correct on most of his observations but the main
part of the frame (with the upper tang, etc.) is not from a number
five action. Based on the upper tang markings, this is a No. 1
second type with bar type extractor. I don't think Remington made
this frame type past 1870 or 1871.
Cheers!
Webb
Marlinman93 is correct on most of his observations but the main
part of the frame (with the upper tang, etc.) is not from a number
five action. Based on the upper tang markings, this is a No. 1
second type with bar type extractor. I don't think Remington made
this frame type past 1870 or 1871.
Cheers!
Webb
Re: Another Rolling Block ID Request
Webb, Marlinman,
Thank you! Based on what I was finding I was wondering if it might be something like this. It seemed too clean, the mismatched numbers confused me since I thought both tangs were one piece, and nothing quite matched what I was seeing on other posts.
Appreciate both of your insights!
Jim
Thank you! Based on what I was finding I was wondering if it might be something like this. It seemed too clean, the mismatched numbers confused me since I thought both tangs were one piece, and nothing quite matched what I was seeing on other posts.
Appreciate both of your insights!
Jim
Re: Another Rolling Block ID Request
The 1/4" all thread was concealed inside the forestock(?) before I took it off to check for more markings on the underside of the barrel. I hadn't really given its presence much thought, just figured it was the way to keep the base of the forestock(?) from moving in any given direction.marlinman93 wrote: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:16 pm The 1/4" all thread sticking out of the front of the action is quite puzzling, and I have no idea why it's there? Likely someone threaded the wiping rod lug to 1/4-2oNC, but why?
I guess that's not how they're usually built though, haha.
I tried googling "wiping rod lug" and didn't really come up with anything other than barrel cleaning tools; if you have a moment would you mind elaborating on what that is?
Appreciated,
Jim
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 10:47 pm
Re: Another Rolling Block ID Request
Originally this action was fitted with a full length barrel and forearm and would have had a cleaning rod underneath the barrel. The receiver had a post or lug screwed into the bottom of the barrel just inside the area the 1/4" all thread rod is now. Those cleaning rods were threaded smaller size and likely someone drilled it out larger to accept that 1/4" rod.Zekedev wrote: Tue Jan 14, 2025 3:16 amThe 1/4" all thread was concealed inside the forestock(?) before I took it off to check for more markings on the underside of the barrel. I hadn't really given its presence much thought, just figured it was the way to keep the base of the forestock(?) from moving in any given direction.marlinman93 wrote: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:16 pm The 1/4" all thread sticking out of the front of the action is quite puzzling, and I have no idea why it's there? Likely someone threaded the wiping rod lug to 1/4-2oNC, but why?
I guess that's not how they're usually built though, haha.
I tried googling "wiping rod lug" and didn't really come up with anything other than barrel cleaning tools; if you have a moment would you mind elaborating on what that is?
Appreciated,
Jim
I missed the extractor screw on the left side that Webb caught, which as he said makes this an early black powder #1 action. As a BP action fitted with a modern smokeless barrel this gun should never be fired in whatever smokeless cartridge it's chambered for now. I't basically a wall hanger or a good donor action for a BP cartridge rifle build.
Re: Another Rolling Block ID Request
Ohh ok, copy that. Thanks so much for the additional info!
Re: Another Rolling Block ID Request
Hi There,
There were No. 5 frames drilled and tapped for the bar type extractor
retainer screw (model 1897). That screw was eliminated in the 1901/
1902 model and newer which used an ejector instead of an extractor.
Cheers!
Webb
Actually, what tipped me off was the tang markings (ending in 1866).marlinman93 wrote: Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:20 am I missed the extractor screw on the left side that Webb caught, which as he said makes this an early black powder #1 action.
There were No. 5 frames drilled and tapped for the bar type extractor
retainer screw (model 1897). That screw was eliminated in the 1901/
1902 model and newer which used an ejector instead of an extractor.
Cheers!
Webb