722 "B" question

Topics related to Post - 1898 Remington Rifles
BrotherRockeye
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:45 pm
Location: Saskatchewan Canada

722 "B" question

Post by BrotherRockeye »

OK folks,
I need some expert opinions regarding whether this rifle is wearing factory B wood.
The current owner says yes and that Remington confirmed it.
What say you all?
TIA!
Image
Image
Ted
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:16 pm

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by Ted »

Not an expert but, I have seen a few original 721B and 722B rifles over the years....none had the hook grip, forend cap or checkering pattern like the rifle pictured.
Wulfman
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: N.W. Wyoming

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by Wulfman »

.
Nope!
Looks like an old Fajen stock (which somebody checkered) to me.

Nice looking, but hardly "factory".

Den

.
BrotherRockeye
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:45 pm
Location: Saskatchewan Canada

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by BrotherRockeye »

I'm thinking of buying this rifle.

I've been told it is 80% but only have 3 pictures to go by...

According to my Blue Book a factory BDL in .244 at 80% is $500

so how would this stock affect the overall value of the rifle?
Wulfman
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: N.W. Wyoming

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by Wulfman »

.
BrotherRockeye wrote:I'm thinking of buying this rifle.

I've been told it is 80% but only have 3 pictures to go by...

According to my Blue Book a factory BDL in .244 at 80% is $500

so how would this stock affect the overall value of the rifle?
To me, it depends on what the seller is asking and what the buyer's expectations are.
The majority of the 721s and 722s were "plain Jane" and putting a stock like that on one does enhance the appearance.......but, then, it's no longer "original".
Purchasing one of those stocks to put on a rifle could amount to a couple of hundred dollars, or more. Also, it's pretty hard to find older firearms that are completely original.

I did some searching on the gun sales sites and didn't find any over about $450.00.

If the seller is asking an amount in the range you've stated, it probably wouldn't be out of line, considering the deflation of our money. About 20 some years ago when I was accumulating my 721s, 722s and 725s, they were going for about half (or less) of the dollar figures we're throwing around.

Hope that helps.

Den

.
BrotherRockeye
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:45 pm
Location: Saskatchewan Canada

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by BrotherRockeye »

it does help Den,thanks.

Unfortunately the current owner seems to think it's worth $800 in spite of the current Blue Book value of an original 80% (his grading) condition firearm.
John Gyde
Posts: 854
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 9:52 pm

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by John Gyde »

I'd sure like to see the confirmation from Rem. I'd probably be willing to pay the seller if he could produce it.

I'll step out on a limb and say it sure ain't factory "B" wood. If the rifle was a "B" it would be so stamped. Rem would not put "B" grade wood on a standard production rifle, and that ain't "B" grade wood anyway.

A factory recoil pad on a 722????
BrotherRockeye
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:45 pm
Location: Saskatchewan Canada

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by BrotherRockeye »

would it be marked on the barrel?

The fella is French so communication ain't simple :)
she have also a small B on the barrel in memory
Wulfman
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: N.W. Wyoming

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by Wulfman »

.
BrotherRockeye wrote:would it be marked on the barrel?

The fella is French so communication ain't simple :)
she have also a small B on the barrel in memory
The letter you're being quoted is probably part of the date code and not a grade letter.

http://www.remingtonsociety.com/rsa/que ... arrelcodes

Den

.
BrotherRockeye
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:45 pm
Location: Saskatchewan Canada

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by BrotherRockeye »

lol - thanks Den...
to be honest,getting a straight answer is like pulling teeth...trying to get more pictures or information is frustrating as ...
Think I'll keep looking unless he comes around a bit...

Thanks very much.
umcpumpgun
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by umcpumpgun »

I don't want to burst anybody's bubble,but the stock has never seen the Rem. Factory. I own several Rem. grade guns,B through F grade. The upgraded wood has definite patterns they follow. This wood is very nice,but not original. I agree it looks like a Fagen wood. The hooked grip and rosewood grip cap is a no brainer. I think it wort maybe a little more than a standard gun as most people want a gun like this original. This was probably done in the 60 early 70's range since this look was popular then.
BrotherRockeye
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:45 pm
Location: Saskatchewan Canada

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by BrotherRockeye »

thanks for the reply.
nobody here has a bubble to burst, we all know that isn't a factory stock.
The fella trying to sell it to me for double what it's worth is the only one clinging to the factory myth.
John Gyde
Posts: 854
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 9:52 pm

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by John Gyde »

So.... Why are you still interested in a gun with an aftermarket stock & a price double what others might sell for??? Why not move on to an honest gun and an informed seller??? My guess is that it is worth less than an original....
BrotherRockeye
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:45 pm
Location: Saskatchewan Canada

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by BrotherRockeye »

go back 3 posts and read again John :wink:
oneoldsap
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 3:35 pm

Re: 722 "B" question

Post by oneoldsap »

Those Frogs are real knotheads aren't they ?
Post Reply